A lot to think about? The objective here is to provide an interpretation of your results and a description of any significant findings. The text alignment should be fully justified. Often, this outline will also serve as the structure for the standard as well. Instead, refer to the source with a number in a square bracket, e. The subjects in the outline will become the clauses and subclauses in the document. Both types receive equal peer reviews; it is merely the presentation that differs.
The in-text citation is shown as a number within square brackets and allows the reader to find the full reference in the numbered bibliography at the end of the text. Each time a writer adds a citation, they should insert a number within square brackets making it possible to find the complete reference on the References page. Looking for a tool to save you time with your academic essay citations and bibliography? Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd ed. To see more information about the formats below, hover your cursor over Reference List Entries on the menu and select the format you want. Once you have referred to a source and given it a number, continue to use that number as you cite that source throughout the paper. Add the references in numerical sequence one-by-one after the 1st citation , and do not forget to include the bracketed number at the beginning of every reference.
Stick to the defined standards verbs for the sake of clarity between you and the users of your standard. Example: Adel Al Muhairy would be cited as A. Avoid placing fi gures and tables before thei r first mention in the text. Often, this is done by splitting up the work among Working Group members. It is also not a science lab report. Use words rather than symbols.
A discussion of any recommendations for further work is also a fine addition, if relevant. The final two sections, Conclusion and References, are also relatively standard with their titling and content. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the Abstract is a sort of first paragraph; it is totally separate. When printing, all pages should be one-sided so that the backs remain blank. Another good way to catch errors is to give the paper to somebody else to read.
Figure axis labels are often a source of confusion. Next, the results should be given and analyzed. Number your pages lightly in pencil on the upper right-hand corner, on the back. The technical editor will then compile this work into one document. Please ensure that all template text is removed from your conference paper prior to submission to the conference. Sometimes an Acknowledgements section is inserted between the Conclusions and References. If the details of the figure cannot be seen when shrunk down, then consider breaking it into multiple figures.
However, we do not recommend that you link to individual files because they may be updated or replaced without notice. City of Publication: Publisher, Year Published. Next, an outline is created. Select Save when the File Download window appears. Even though the use of color is now acceptable, solid fill colors are preferred as they contrast well both on screen and on a black-and-white hardcopy. Another helpful tool is to discuss as a group how the group is going to explain the information contained in your standard. The scope and purpose should be kept in mind at all times, since this will be what the will be evaluating the document against.
Full length papers are peer reviewed in detail and edited, and multiple review periods are possible. You should examine all types of publications, from approved standards to magazine articles, to make sure you're as informed as you can be prior to the actual task of writing. Each table and figure needs a written explanation; do not assume the reader can understand it on their own. The below examples are from. Every draft version of a standard has to be labeled with the appropriate copyright notices. First-order headings should be 12-point and bold.
One error that is frequently found in paper submittals is that little, if any, research was done by the authors to determine that the work is indeed new and original. Abstract The Abstract is the most important part of a technical paper, and perhaps one of the most misunderstood parts. Researching the subject matter is a good fundamental engineering practice. The is a professional organization supporting many branches of engineering, computer science, and information technology. The first milestone for many Working Groups is finishing their first complete draft.
The more people who review it, the more comments will be received, creating opportunities to improve the paper. The other appears at the beginning of the document. Manuscripts will be either: accepted, accepted with required changes requiring a second peer review , accepted with suggested changes, or rejected. The space between the two columns is 4mm 0. To achieve this end, it must first be determined that a particular body of work is unique and valuable to others. One of the challenges in splitting up the work is the potential for inconsistency of tone in the document as a result.