The Burmese were jailed, forced to cram in the ill kept cages of their lock-ups, and beat with bamboos. Elephants also experience emotions such as anger, joy, and grief. Most of the corpses I have seen looked devilish. The narrator simply does not like the way imperialism makes him feel and have to act. The narrator portrays strong negative feelings towards British imperialism through his job, thoughts, and his physical actions. The rifle represents the weapon of tyranny and the cruel methods used by the British to keep the local population under control. The Asian elephant is an endangered animal and the number of Asian elephants has decreased throughout the world and if nothing is said or done, they will go extinct.
Primal urges such as this often accompany humans when they are forced, as in capture, to rely on their most basic instincts to survive. He describes his inner conflict—on the one hand hating the tyrannical empire that he represents; on the other, being driven mad by the Burmese people who jeer at him and make his job miserable. He wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it. After Orwell's death in 1950, the essay was republished several times, including in Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays 1950 , 1957 , and Selected Writings 1958. Orwell is a British officer in Burma.
Although he does not want to kill the elephant now that it seems peaceful, the narrator feels pressured by the demand of the crowd for the act to be carried out. What followed was both tragic and comic; childish and serious. He is puppet being controlled. On April 16, 2007, in the town of Blacksburg Virginia, a college student who attended Virginia Tech, opened gunfire to his fellow classmates. It is certain that imperialism unjustly exhausted global resources and is therefore deserving of its condemnation. I had almost made up my mind that the whole story was a pack of lies, when we heard yells a little distance away. He narrates the conditions of the prisoners in cells who are tortured in an inhumane way.
To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; George Orwell, 283. I shoved the cartridges into the magazine and lay down on the road to get a better aim. The elephant, at first glance, may seem to be a representative of Imperial Britain. The elephant lies on the ground, breathing laboriously. This leads to the sense that the narrator feels oppressed by the people as they are controlling, whereas normally he would be controlling the Burmese. Perhaps this is because it has one of the largest hearts in the world, weighing up to 46 pounds.
The crowd on his back had grown. In the end, due to Orwell's decision, the elephant lay dying in a pool of blood. He presents the reader with his interpretations in clear, expository prose. Upon arriving on the scene and seeing a man dead, he sends for an elephant rifle. I marched down the hill, looking and feeling a fool, with the rifle over my shoulder and an ever-growing army of people jostling at my heels. However this does not justify the killing of the elephant due to the emphasis of the long suffering of the animal. By creating contrasting characteristics, Orwell is able to further convey the self-destructive nature of imperialism.
It seems like he's angry yet uncertain about how he really feels in his community. And if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh. Persuasion is an inescapable fact of communication. I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool. The researchers calculated that in the absence of poaching, about 3 percent of an elephant population would be expected to die each year. One day something happened which in a roundabout way was enlightening.
This entry was posted in and tagged , , by. The second layer of the story describes the consequences and eventual fall of imperialism. In Moulmein, in Lower Burma, I was hated by large numbers of people — the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me. After a bit of time, the elephant sinks to its knees and begins to drool. I had halted on the road. The miserable attitude of the author, the strained tensions between the British and the Burmese, and the needless suffering of the elephant all serve to create the impression that imperialism is a destructive system.
One of the most popular mediums of art in the present time is filmmaking. Guns control prohibits good people from having the ability to stop the bad guys. It starts with a straightforward discussion of that conflict—what constitutes it and how it manifests—and it proceeds to illustrate it by way of scene and action. Nobody dared raise a riot for the fear of strong action from the imperial police force but still if ever a European woman ventured in the market alone, one would spit betel juice on her clothes. Film uses moving photographs to narrate a story, express emotions and convey ideas.
Also, the elephant is powerful and so is the narrator because of his position but both of them are puppets in the hands of their masters. The Burman crowd behind him, the audience. These bison, or buffalo, are believed to be shot and killed between March 13 and March 15. Dogs are known for their obedience and unbroken loyalty. But at that moment I glanced round at the crowd that had followed me. Also since he was seen as the figured head of the state he had to take action or ruin not only his own standings with the crowd but also with the face of the British Empire. I was sub-divisional police officer of the town, and in an aimless, petty kind of way anti-European feeling was very bitter.
The Burmese, like the elephant, embody two distinct personas—the exploited and the oppressors. So how can the uses of appropriate language affect the whole narration of a story. Both essays happen in unfamiliar places where there were racism and discrimination. Orwell captures the hearts of readers by revealing the struggles he has while dealing with the burden of his own beliefs and morals. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly. This imbalance of power in colonialism seems counterintuitive, and Orwell literalizes the imbalance by showing his ability to kill the elephant singlehandedly.