Actually there was no such due to amount of is due of debt to A. Wearing uniform of soldier or officer of army navy or air force or Wearing garb of carrying token used by soldier sailor or airman or Pretending to be soldier of army or Impersonating to be army officer is criminal offence under section 140 of Indian penal code. Filed the case in Negotiable Instrument Act 138 Criminal Case. Will i be in trouble if notice received or refused. But pursuant to the rise in dealings with cheques also rises the practice of giving cheques without any intention of honoring them.
One day he sent me a legal notice and it says he borrowed the money from me not her he is saying he does not know her. In the case under N. Director Must be Wrongly Arraigned In the case of Gunmala Sales Pvt Ltd v. Thus if a cheque is valid for three months and is presented to the bank within a period of six months the provisions of this section shall not be attracted. Judge is also giving extension every time.
The cheques were presented for payment but returned unpaid for insufficient fund. In the cheqe A wrote his business name with date in his own hand writing. The party had signed an agreement and also given blank cheques for security, with written undertaking that these cheques will not be dishonored. The offence under this section is cognizable, bailable and non-compoundable, and is triable by metropolitan magistrate or magistrate of the first or second class. How can I legally deal with this situation? You may click here and find the best lawyer in your city to file a Cheque Bounce case.
It is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. Union of India in light of Article 21 of the Constitution of India where the court held that; Mere taking of loan is not, thus, made punishable under certain circumstances and after following certain conditions. The sub-divisional Magistrate upon considering evidence of residents in locality came to the conclusion that people in general suffered discomfort and injury to physical health which amounted to public nuisance. There was and argument between my advocate and the complainant advocate and the case was taken for judgement. On the contention of the offences being mutually exclusive, the court was of the view that an accused is liable to be punished from the stage of an attempt to commission of the offence and various offences like this can be charged together.
The cheque was issued by one individual to second where no any contract or performance or other activities are involved as given in the company. Y 1 lakh X has bank account in Chennai. What is the outcome of the Case? Now Almost 2 years are getting over from the case, but case is not over. The Court found no application of Section 300 of Criminal procedure code and Article 20 of the Constitution of India. Kindly guide what to do in this scenario. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. On 5-7-14 Cheques along with bank intimation letter were collected from the bank.
It is very difficult to our authorized officer to attend each and every case, so company has given authority to local officer through power of attorney the same was submitted in the court through our panel advocate, but the judge was not accepting the new person for attending the court and he is saying that there is a no law for changing the authorized person, but our advocate is saying all other courts are accepting this type of authority, then the judge was asked provide if any judgment copy is available with you and please provide me the citations. The words as appearing in clause b of S. Dear Sir, My son-in-law has paid an amount of Rs. You may post your specific query based on your facts and details to get a response from one of the Lawyers at LawRato. The act of dishonour must be communicated to the Drawer, within 30 days of receipt of the dishonoured cheque, through Registered post, under Postal Certificate or Speed Post although such communication i. The job of the courts should not only be the strict interpretation of statute but also to uphold the very purpose of law for overall public good. How to tackle this situation.
Normally in criminal law existence of guilty intent is an essential ingredient of a crime. Various High courts and the Supreme Court have explained this many a time. Mere allegation in complaint that accused persons are directors and responsible officers of the company is not sufficient. The second party partner is not attending and his where abouts are not known. What can I do at this juncture. Some time in 2002 I took a personal loan form national bank.
In case he fails to pay this amt additional 2 monts imprisonment has to be gone through. The provisions appear to be mutually exclusive and the question of one replacing the other does not arise. Good faith anticipates an honest effort to discover the facts upon which the exercise of power rests. I am shocked that after paying stamp fees and service tax and incurring lawyers fees etc, I am still where I started even after two and half years. Supreme court did that to ease their work load of the lakhs of pending cases. Is this valid and possible? There have been several judgments where the court was not satisfied that the intention to cheat existed, and hence quashed the case.