Document F This loss adds to the evidence that people of France did not want the Reign of Terror, therefore it is not justified. Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Empire of Japan, Hiroshima 1576 Words 4 Pages War on terror refers to the ongoing military campaign led by U. Does the French Revolution still sound justified to you? Touchy-feely is no way to run a government. Furthermore, people disrespected crucifixes and religious representations. Michael Galifos The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified? During the Terror, the of which was the most prominent member exercised virtual dictatorial control over the French government. It was a time of fierceness and anger, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people living in France at that period of time.
The Reign of Terror started in 1789 and was a time when supporters of the French Revolution ran wild and started killing non-supporters or counterrevolutionaries. The French Revolution began when the most privileged class of France, the aristocracy, tried to resist reforms attempted by the government. Anyone suspected of aiding the enemy was swiftly put on trial and executed. Were these measures used against the french people justified? The political purges and persecutions during the Reignincluded Danton, who was supposedly too lenient. It pursued stability through violence and destabilized itself routinely with infighting among its leaders.
The National Convention of France was a great factor in encouraging the start of the Reign of Terror; they continued on to have dictatorial power for three years during and after the Reign. There's nobody against the revolution to kill! The question is whether or not this behavior by the revolutionary French government was justified. They beheaded anyone even suspected of helping a foreign power invade. Support your position thoroughly and logically. Document B, a map of the war during 1972 shows France lost several decisive victories and lost cities and lives.
The ancien regime would never have done this but the Revolutionaries did so, and did this during the 1793-1794 era, during the so called reign of terror. Why did the sans-culottes remain discontented after the 1789 revolutions? These times ruined families and homes across france, killing innocent men without trying them on trial in front of a fair jury. Essay Sample The reign of Terror was a violent and savage part of the French Revolution. This was illegal, and their choices led to their deaths. The spirit of idealism that gripped France during the early phases of the Revolution gave way to mass paranoia and extremism, culminating in Robespierre's cruel regime. The people wanted stable government. To be fair, it was not just the king of France, it were the aristocrats and nobels who really made the ancien regime terrible.
These were Collectivism, the purges and the terror he caused by the people living in Russia during his reign. This was because Louis was having financial, and harvest issues. However Europe could no establish who should be the new ruler of France. It was on these tenets that the revolution began and ironically only four years later a man of great strength would take control of France and begin the Reign of Terror, this man was Maximilien Robespierre. After the French Revolution, Edmund Burke from Great Britain became one of the most famous critics of the Revolution.
As such the new republic was under great threat of being overthrown. Maybe it was all a cover-up. In the Apology, we learn that the people of Athens claimed that Socrates did not believe in the gods of their city, but in other spiritual things. The excesses of the Reign of Terror combined with the decreased threat from other countries led to increased opposition to the Committee of Public Safety and to Robespierre himself. Doc C states: in the spring of 1793, a counterrevolution against the Republican government broke out. France was experience a great amount of change in the summer of 1793, when the Jacobins succeeded the moderates in the National Convention. The reign of Terror was not justified this claim can be supported by three main reasons the threats to the government weren't big enough, the methods did not justify it, and the actions of the government contradicted the ideals of the revolution.
However, the revolution was successful in making a republic government. They feared the old order and beheaded any of the old nobility who suggested it be reestablished. Committee of Public Safety, French Revolution, Georges Danton 834 Words 3 Pages drenching event of the Reign of Terror. The people answered by setting up their own legislative branch called the National Assembly in 1789. The revolutionary leader Robespierre and journalist Marat explained the more blood the better so that was what raged the people and started the Reign of Terror.
Adolf Hitler, League of Nations, Nazi Germany 857 Words 3 Pages involved in the Vietnam War? One of the claims made by France was that they were under constant attack by Austrian and Prussian troops. Introduction The purpose of this essay is to explore the issues surrounding the morality of terrorism. There are many events that led up to the cause of the American Revolution. Causing the middle class and the wealthy classes to benefit greatly from the revolution, the sans-culottes however suffered with the disappearance of their livelihood. What kind of government can realize these wonders? These and other obligations seemed senseless and unreasonable in an age when people were coming to believe in the rule of reason. Economics, Labor theory of value 1340 Words 5 Pages the reign of Stalin he was able to establish himself as a successful dictator through totalitarian rule. From trivial folklore, such as George Washington chopping down a cherry tree, to the incredibly wrong, the African slave trade; people's views of history can be shaped and molded.
Tax collectors could appear from nowhere. Correlation does not equal causation. The blade of the law should hover over all the guilty. I understand this may not be the traditional historic view probably because perhaps circumstance is not emphasized as much as it should be. Terror was the order of the day in the words of Maximilien Robespierre who led the Terror. This is an outstanding achievement and certainly cannot be discredited. So in both cases, I vote Con.